Factors affecting the long‐term prognosis of patients in the AYA generation with epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter propensity score matching analysis.

Objective: Ovarian carcinoma (OvCa) is more common in the elderly, but also affects the adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation, which refers to those aged 15–39 years. Although the characteristics of OvCa may differ between AYAs and non‐AYAs, limited information is currently available on differences in prognostic factors. Therefore, we herein investigated prognostic factors for and the prognosis of OvCa in AYAs. We also examined the prognostic impact of fertility‐sparing surgery in a subgroup analysis. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on 4897 patients with OvCa from the databases of multiple institutions and ultimately included 1161 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We performed a survival analysis to compare AYAs and non‐AYAs with backgrounds that conformed to those of AYAs using the propensity score (PS) matching method. A Cox regression analysis was also conducted to evaluate each predictor of recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the original population. As a subgroup analysis, a multivariate analysis stratified by the AYA and non‐AYA generations was performed. Results: In total, 119 AYA patients were included in this study. After PS adjustments, no significant differences were observed in RFS or OS between AYAs and non‐AYAs. Prognostic factors differed between AYAs and non‐AYAs, particularly in histology and cytology. A multivariate analysis stratified by the AYA and non‐AYA generations described that uterine‐preserving surgery (UPS) did not have a significant impact on the prognosis of AYAs or non‐AYAs. In cases with recurrence, no significant differences were observed in RFS and recurrent sites in the two groups. Conclusion: Characteristic prognostic factors for EOC in AYAs were identified. The present results indicate the limited prognostic impact of UPS for EOC in AYAs. Synopsis: There were no significant differences in prognosis between AYAs and non‐AYAs. AYAs had specific prognostic factors and uterine‐preserving surgery was not a significant prognostic factor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]