Back to Search Start Over

Recommendations for pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice guidelines in the US.

Authors :
Hertz, Daniel L
Bousman, Chad A
McLeod, Howard L
Monte, Andrew A
Voora, Deepak
Orlando, Lori A
Crutchley, Rustin D
Brown, Benjamin
Teeple, Wrenda
Rogers, Sara
Patel, Jai N
Source :
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 8/15/2024, Vol. 81 Issue 16, p672-683. 12p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose Pharmacogenetic testing can identify patients who may benefit from personalized drug treatment. However, clinical uptake of pharmacogenetic testing has been limited. Clinical practice guidelines recommend biomarker tests that the guideline authors deem to have demonstrated clinical utility, meaning that testing improves treatment outcomes. The objective of this narrative review is to describe the current status of pharmacogenetic testing recommendations within clinical practice guidelines in the US. Summary Guidelines were reviewed for pharmacogenetic testing recommendations for 21 gene-drug pairs that have well-established drug response associations and all of which are categorized as clinically actionable by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. The degree of consistency within and between organizations in pharmacogenetic testing recommendations was assessed. Relatively few clinical practice guidelines that provide a pharmacogenetic testing recommendation were identified. Testing recommendations for HLA-B*57:01 before initiation of abacavir and G6PD before initiation of rasburicase, both of which are included in drug labeling, were mostly consistent across guidelines. Gene-drug pairs with at least one clinical practice guideline recommending testing or stating that testing could be considered included CYP2C19 -clopidogrel, CYP2D6 -codeine, CYP2D6 -tramadol, CYP2B6 -efavirenz, TPMT -thiopurines, and NUDT15 -thiopurines. Testing recommendations for the same gene-drug pair were often inconsistent between organizations and sometimes inconsistent between different guidelines from the same organization. Conclusion A standardized approach to evaluating the evidence of clinical utility for pharmacogenetic testing may increase the inclusion and consistency of pharmacogenetic testing recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, which could benefit patients and society by increasing clinical use of pharmacogenetic testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10792082
Volume :
81
Issue :
16
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179042492
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae110