Back to Search Start Over

Strategies for Developing High-Volume Fly Ash Concrete with High Early-Age Strength for Precast Applications.

Authors :
Sao, Zacharia
Kaladharan, Gopakumar
Yoon, Jinyoung
Reddy Kamasani, Chiranjeevi
Rajabipour, Farshad
Gombeda, Matthew J.
Source :
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. Oct2024, Vol. 36 Issue 10, p1-13. 13p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Partial replacement of portland cement with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as fly ash, is an effective strategy for improving durability and reducing the CO2 footprint of concrete. However, using high-volume fly ash (HVFA) binders in precast and prestressed concrete is currently limited; largely due to reduced early-age strength development that impedes rapid production and prestressing of precast concrete. To investigate and address this challenge, HVFA mortars with a minimum of 40% fly ash by mass of cementitious materials were developed and tested in this study. Two fresh fly ashes (an ASTM C618 Class F and a Class C) and a landfilled fly ash (Class F) were included. Various strategies for improving the early strength were evaluated, including gypsum optimization, chemical accelerators, steam curing, use of CSA cements, and adding other reactive SCMs like silica fume, calcined clay, and slag cement. Steam curing and the use of CSA cement at high dosages (40% of total binder) were found to be the most successful strategies across all three fly ashes. Additionally, significant improvements were observed with gypsum optimization (for Class C fly ash) and the use of accelerators (for Class F fly ashes), and these strategies are likely to be more feasible considering later-age strength and economic viability. Interestingly, HVFA mixtures made with the landfilled fly ash used in this study were able to achieve high early strengths with water-to-cementitious materials ratio adjustment alone. These HVFA mixtures were also found to be less responsive to accelerators when compared to the fresh Class F fly ash, highlighting an important distinction between the materials despite the similarity in chemical composition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08991561
Volume :
36
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179021583
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-18004