Back to Search Start Over

Prognostic significance of residual tumor at restaging transurethral bladder resection in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors :
Guigui, Alexandre
Basile, Giuseppe
Zattoni, Fabio
Gallioli, Andrea
Verri, Paolo
Aumatell, Julia
Gondran-Tellier, Bastien
Lechevallier, Eric
Bastide, Cyrille
Uleri, Alessandro
Sica, Michele
Long-Depaquit, Thibaut
Dinoi, Giuseppe
Moro, Fabrizio Dal
Akiki, Akram
Toledano, Harry
Rajwa, Pawel
Montorsi, Francesco
Amparore, Daniele
Porpiglia, Francesco
Source :
World Journal of Urology. 8/12/2024, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p1-6. 6p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: To assess prognostic significance of residual tumor at repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) in contemporary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients. Methods: Patients were identified retrospectively from eight referral centers in France, Italy and Spain. The cohort included consecutive patients with high or very-high risk NMIBC who underwent reTUR and subsequent adjuvant BCG therapy. Results: A total of 440 high-risk NMIBC patients were screened, 29 (6%) were upstaged ≥ T2 at reTUR and 411 were analyzed (T1 stage: n = 275, 67%). Residual tumor was found in 191 cases (46%). In patients with T1 tumor on initial TURBT, persistent T1 tumor was found in 18% of reTUR (n = 49/275). In patients with high-grade Ta tumor on initial TURBT, T1 tumor was found in 6% of reTUR (n = 9/136). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, we found no statistical association between the use of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD, p = 0.4) or type of resection (conventional vs. en bloc, p = 0.6) and the risk of residual tumor. The estimated 5-yr recurrence and progression-free survival were 56% and 94%, respectively. Residual tumor was significantly associated with a higher risk of recurrence (p < 0.001) but not progression (p = 0.11). Only residual T1 tumor was associated with a higher risk of progression (p < 0.001) with an estimated 5-yr progression-free survival rate of 76%. Conclusions: ReTUR should remain a standard for T1 tumors, irrespective of the use of en bloc resection or PDD and could be safely omitted in high-grade Ta tumors. Persistent T1 tumor at reTUR should not exclude these patients from conservative management, and further studies are needed to explore the benefit of a third resection in this subgroup. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07244983
Volume :
42
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
World Journal of Urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178970305
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05192-x