Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) for Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response among Different Breast Cancer Subtypes.

Simple Summary: The indications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) have expanded in recent years both for locally advanced and early-stage breast cancer, with different pathological complete response (pCR) rates among different molecular subtypes. This retrospective two-center study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) in assessing the response to NAT in breast cancer patients. The CEM sensitivity and specificity were 66.2% and 75.2%, with the highest specificity (80.9%) in HR+/HER2− and the highest sensitivity (70%) in triple-negative breast cancer. CEM is a valid tool to assess the pCR with different performances among the molecular subtypes and may be reliable in the decisional process of de-escalating surgical management. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) plays a crucial role in breast cancer (BC) treatment, both in advanced BC and in early-stage BC, with different rates of pathological complete response (pCR) among the different BC molecular subtypes. Imaging monitoring is mandatory to evaluate the NAT efficacy. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) in BC patients undergoing NAT. This retrospective two-center study included 174 patients. The breast lesions were classified based on the molecular subtypes in hormone receptor (HR+)/HER2−, HER2+, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The histopathological analysis performed following surgery was used as a reference standard for the pCR. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were measured overall and for the different subtypes. We enrolled 174 patients, 79/174 (46%) HR+/HER2−, 59/174 (33.9%) HER2+, and 35/174 (20.1%) TNBC; the pCR was found in 64/174 (36.8%), of which 57.1% were TNBCs. In the total population, the CEM sensitivity and specificity were 66.2% and 75.2%, with a PPV of 61.4% and an NPV of 78.8%. The highest specificity (80.9%) and NPV (91.7%) were found in HR+/HER2−, while the highest sensitivity (70%) and PPV appeared (73.7%) in TNBC. The results indicate that CEM is a valid tool to assess the pCR, with different performances among the subtypes of BC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]