Back to Search Start Over

629 - A novel efficacy index for long-term therapy outcomes expressed by maintenance of EASI 75 and IGA 0,1 response in atopic dermatitis.

Authors :
Silverberg, Jonathan I
Irvine, Alan
Foley, Peter
Rosso, James Del
Schacht, Alexander
Dossenbach, Martin
Casillas, Marta
Johansson, Erin
Gallo, Gaia
Gold, Linda Stein
Source :
British Journal of Dermatology. 2024 Supplement, Vol. 191, p1-2. 2p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic inflammatory disease requiring long-term, continuous therapy, yet in real life, patients may need to temporarily interrupt therapy. Objectives To indirectly compare long-term outcomes with lebrikizumab, tralokinumab, and dupilumab, we present an exploratory efficacy index, which accounts for on-drug and off-drug combined outcomes at Week 52. Methods The data set consisted of patients who, after 16 weeks, responded to treatment, defined as achieving either an IGA 0,1 or EASI 75 score, and who were randomized to receive maintenance dosages of lebrikizumab 250 mg Q4W (ADvocate1; ADvocate2), tralokinumab 300 mg Q2W (ECZTRA1; ECZTRA 2), and dupilumab 300 mg QW, Q2W (SOLO-CONTINUE) or were randomized to withdraw these treatments up to Week 52. The efficacy index is based on a weighted combination of response rates at Week 52, using non-responder imputation results, for IGA 0,1 or EASI 75, for patients who were either in the treatment continuation or the withdrawal arm. Here, we report the efficacy index, in which the weight places equal emphasis on continuing or stopping treatment, and we compare the efficacy index of tralokinumab and dupilumab with lebrikizumab. Results The efficacy index (95% CI) for lebrikizumab, tralokinumab, and dupilumab, respectively, was 53% (45%-61%), 45% (37%-53%), and 34% (28%-40%) with IGA 0,1; 63% (55%-71%), 42% (35%-49%), and 51% (45%-57%) with EASI 75. With IGA 0,1, lebrikizumab was statistically different from dupilumab; with EASI 75, lebrikizumab was statistically different from dupilumab and tralokinumab. Conclusions This novel efficacy index, which accounts for the importance of continuing or stopping therapy after Week 16, may be a useful tool to indirectly compare long-term treatment outcomes. Lebrikizumab's higher efficacy index may translate to improved long-term management of AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00070963
Volume :
191
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
British Journal of Dermatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178936806
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae266.013