Radikalleşme ile Mücadelede Yerel Yönetimlerin Rolü-Londra Örneği.

The participation of different institutions and actors in countering radicalization is important for the success of a long-term challenging strategy. Local governments can serve as executive and auxiliary elements in countering radicalization options, which can be graded with the Public Health Model. Accordingly, local governments, which can effectively benefit from primary and secondary prevention, can reduce negativities that trigger radicalization such as marginalization and stigmatization among the society and increase social harmony with the social projects they will develop. The main claim of the study is that local governments can be effective as practitioners at the primary prevention level of countering radicalization and can serve as complementary and auxiliary elements at the secondary prevention level. To test this claim, the study will examine the UK example on a London scale. England's methods of countering radicalization will be discussed by analyzing published strategy documents, and the London example will be explained by examining the reports regarding the ongoing Countering Violent Extremism Program using critical discourse analysis. Also, the role of local governments will be discussed by interpreting the numerical data related to the Channel program across London. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]