Back to Search
Start Over
Masquerade of authority: hijacked journals are gaining more credibility than original ones.
- Source :
-
Diagnosis (2194-802X) . Aug2024, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p235-239. 5p. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- At the moment, the academic world is faced with various challenges that negatively impact science integrity. One is hijacked journals, a second, inauthentic website for indexed legitimate journals, managed by cybercriminals. These journals publish any manuscript by charging authors and pose a risk to scientific integrity. This piece compares a journal's original and hijacked versions regarding authority in search engines. A list of 16 medical journals, along with their hijacked versions, has been collected. The MOZ Domain Authority has been used to check the authority of both original and hijacked journals, and the results have been discussed. It indicates that hijacked journals are gaining more credibility than original ones. This should alarm academia and highlights a need for serious action against hijacked journals. The related policies should be planned, and tools should be developed to support easy detection of hijacked journals. On the publishers' side, the visibility of journals' websites must be enhanced to address this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2194802X
- Volume :
- 11
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Diagnosis (2194-802X)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 178881758
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0082