Back to Search Start Over

Reducing alcohol harms whilst minimising impact on hospitality businesses: 'Sweetspot' policy options.

Authors :
Fitzgerald, Niamh
O'Donnell, Rachel
Uny, Isabelle
Martin, Jack G.
Cook, Megan
Graham, Kathryn
Stockwell, Tim
Hughes, Karen
Wilkinson, Claire
McGill, Elizabeth
Miller, Peter G.
Reynolds, Jo
Quigg, Zara
Angus, Colin
Source :
International Journal of Drug Policy. Jul2024, Vol. 129, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

• Alcohol policies that protect public health do not necessarily harm bars. • 'Sweetspot' policies are those which can improve public health without affecting hospitality businesses. • There is good evidence that increasing the price of shop-bought alcohol is a sweetspot policy. • Restricting remote/online alcohol sales is also a likely sweetspot policy. • Measures to shape or manage the night-time economy are less well supported by evidence. During COVID-19, hospitality businesses (e.g. bars, restaurants) were closed/restricted whilst off-sales of alcohol increased, with health consequences. Post-covid, governments face lobbying to support such businesses, but many health services remain under pressure. We appraised 'sweetspot' policy options: those with potential to benefit public services and health, whilst avoiding or minimising negative impact on the hospitality sector. We conducted rapid non-systematic evidence reviews using index papers, citation searches and team knowledge to summarise the literature relating to four possible 'sweetspot' policy areas: pricing interventions (9 systematic reviews (SR); 14 papers/reports); regulation of online sales (1 SR; 1 paper); place-shaping (2 SRs; 18 papers/reports); and violence reduction initiatives (9 SRs; 24 papers/reports); and led two expert workshops (n = 11). Interventions that raise the price of cheaper shop-bought alcohol appear promising as 'sweetspot' policies; any impact on hospitality is likely small and potentially positive. Restrictions on online sales such as speed or timing of delivery may reduce harm and diversion of consumption from on-trade to home settings. Place-shaping is not well-supported by evidence and experts were sceptical. Reduced late-night trading hours likely reduce violence; evidence of impact on hospitality is scant. Other violence reduction initiatives may modestly reduce harms whilst supporting hospitality, but require resources to deliver multiple measures simultaneously in partnership. Available evidence and expert views point to regulation of pricing and online sales as having greatest potential as 'sweetspot' alcohol policies, reducing alcohol harm whilst minimising negative impact on hospitality businesses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09553959
Volume :
129
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Drug Policy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178832741
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104465