Reward value and internal state differentially drive impulsivity and motivation.

Goal-directed behavior is influenced by both reward value as well as internal state. A large body of research has focused on how reward value and internal drives such as hunger influence motivation in rodent models, however less work has focused on how these factors may differentially affect impulsivity. In these studies, we tested the effect of internal drive versus reward value on different facets of reward-related behavior including impulsive action, impulsive choice and, motivation. We varied reward value by changing the concentration of sucrose in the reward outcome, and varied internal drive by manipulating thirst through water restriction. Consistent with the literature we found that both internal state and reward value influenced motivation. However, we found that in high effort paradigms, only internal state influenced motivation with minimal effects of reward value. Interestingly, we found that internal state and reward value differentially influence different subtypes of impulsivity. Internal state, and to a lesser extent, reward value, influenced impulsive action as measured by premature responding. On the other hand, there were minimal effects of either reward value or homeostatic state on impulsive choice as measured by delay discounting. Overall, these studies begin to address how internal state and reward value differentially drive impulsive behavior. Understanding how these factors influence impulsivity is important for developing behavioral interventions and treatment targets for patients with dysregulated motivated or impulsive behavior. • External reward value and internal state are both drives to motivate goal directed behavior. • Both of these factors influence motivation, however internal homeostatic drive dominates under high effort requirements. • Decreasing internal drive decreases impulsive action more than decreasing external reward value. • Neither factor differentially influences impulsive choice measured in a delay discounting paradigm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]