Research on Inter-Satellite Laser Ranging Scale Factor Estimation Methods for Next-Generation Gravity Satellites.

The scale factor serves as a ruler for converting raw phase measurements into physical displacements and significantly impacts the preprocessing of data from the Laser Ranging Interferometer (LRI) in laser ranging systems. In the current GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) mission for low–low tracking gravity satellites, most of the existing LRI scale factor estimation algorithms heavily rely on cross-calibration between instantaneous/biased ranges from the Ka-Band Ranging Interferometer (KBR) and the LRI. However, due to the nonlinearity of the objective function (which includes terms involving the product of scale and time shifts), the scale factor estimation may absorb errors from timing noise. Moreover, future gravity missions or gravity detection tasks may no longer incorporate KBR ranging instruments. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an energy-based method for scale factor estimation using inter-satellite baseline solutions. Comparative analysis indicates that the proposed method effectively disentangles two parameters in the objective function and can be applied in scenarios where KBR data are unavailable, demonstrating promising prospects for practical application. The experimental results show that when the KBR validation residuals are lower than 0.8 mm, the SYSU LRI1B V01 products exhibit residuals below the payload design accuracy thresholds in the frequency band of 2 mHz to 0.1 Hz. Additionally, the stability of the scale factors obtained from the baseline can reach 10−7. Although this is still below the required precision of better than 10−8 for the laser frequency stability in next-generation gravity satellites, advancements in orbit determination technology and the enhanced stability of GPS receivers offer potential for future precision improvements. Currently, this method appears suitable for roughly extracting the scale factor as a stochastic mean over several months or serving as a backup validation strategy for future missions, but it is not well suited to measure day-to-day variations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]