Is Cancer Metabolism an Atavism?

Simple Summary: The atavistic theory of cancer suggests that cancer development proceeds through cells reverting to ancient survival mechanisms. The Serial Atavism Model (SAM) expands on this, proposing that cancer progresses through multiple stages of reversion to earlier evolutionary forms with cells losing modern traits and regaining primitive ones. One example is the Warburg effect, where cancer cells prefer a type of energy production used by ancient cells before Earth's atmosphere had oxygen. However, this review argues that cancer metabolism is too complex to be fully explained by this theory. Cancer cells exhibit a wide range of metabolic behaviors that do not fit neatly into a pattern of reverting to an ancient state, indicating that the SAM may not provide a complete understanding of cancer. The atavistic theory of cancer posits that cancer emerges and progresses through the reversion of cellular phenotypes to more ancestral types with genomic and epigenetic changes deactivating recently evolved genetic modules and activating ancient survival mechanisms. This theory aims at explaining the known cancer hallmarks and the paradox of cancer's predictable progression despite the randomness of genetic mutations. Lineweaver and colleagues recently proposed the Serial Atavism Model (SAM), an enhanced version of the atavistic theory, which suggests that cancer progression involves multiple atavistic reversions where cells regress through evolutionary stages, losing recently evolved traits first and reactivating primitive ones later. The Warburg effect, where cancer cells upregulate glycolysis and lactate production in the presence of oxygen instead of using oxidative phosphorylation, is one of the key feature of the SAM. It is associated with the metabolism of ancient cells living on Earth before the oxygenation of the atmosphere. This review addresses the question of whether cancer metabolism can be considered as an atavistic reversion. By analyzing several known characteristics of cancer metabolism, we reach the conclusion that this version of the atavistic theory does not provide an adequate conceptual frame for cancer research. Cancer metabolism spans a whole spectrum of metabolic states which cannot be fully explained by a sequential reversion to an ancient state. Moreover, we interrogate the nature of cancer metabolism and discuss its characteristics within the framework of the SAM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]