The Effects of Load, Crank Position, and Sex on the Biomechanics and Performance during an Upper Body Wingate Anaerobic Test.

Introduction: The upper body Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) is a 30-smaximal effort sprint against a set load (percentage of body mass). However, there is no consensus on the optimal load and no differential values for males and females, even when there are well-studied anatomical and physiological differences in muscle mass for the upper body. Our goal was to describe the effects of load, sex, and crank position on the kinetics, kinematics, and performance of the upper body WAnT. Methods: Eighteen participants (9 females) performed threeWAnTs at 3%, 4%, and 5%of body mass. Arm crank forces, 2D kinematics, and performance variables were recorded during eachWAnT. Results: Our results showed an increase of ~49% effective force, ~36%peak power, ~5° neck flexion, and ~30° shoulder flexion from 3% to 5% load (P < 0.05). Mean power and anaerobic capacity decreased by 15%, with no changes in fatigue index (P < 0.05). The positions of higher force efficiency were at 12 and 6 o'clock. The least force efficiency occurred at 3 o'clock (P < 0.05). Sex differences showed that males produced 97% more effective force and 109% greater mean power than females, with 11.7%more force efficiency (P < 0.001). Males had 16° more head/neck flexion than females, and females had greater elbow joint variability with 17°morewrist extension at higher loads. Males cycled ~32%faster at 3%versus 5%WAnT load with a 65%higher angular velocity than females. Grip strength, maximal voluntary isometric contraction, mass, and height positively correlated with peak and mean power (P < 0.001). Conclusions: In conclusion, load, sex, and crank position have a significant impact on performance of theWAnT. These factors should be considered when developing and implementing an upper body WAnT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]