Back to Search Start Over

Do different soil use and management systems change root weight?

Authors :
de Almeida, Emizael Menezes
de Araújo, Alexandre Romeiro
Difante, Gelson dos Santos
Motta Macedo, Manuel Cláudio
Montagner, Denise Baptaglin
Gurgel, Antonio Leandro Chaves
Zimmer, Ademir Hugo
Ferreira, Andre Dominghetti
Source :
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. Aug2024, Vol. 67 Issue 4, p479-497. 19p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The objective to examine the effect of management systems on root dry weight, the percentage distribution of root weight in the soil profile, and the soil carbon content. Treatments consisted of 13 management systems established 22 years ago: degraded pasture; continuous pasture, fertilised, and intercropped with a legume species; continuous pasture with fertilisation; continuous pasture without fertilisation; pasture for four years followed by soybean cropping for four years; pasture for four years followed by soybean cropping for four years, with eucalyptus; soybean cropping for four years followed by pasture for four years; soybean cropping for four years followed by pasture for four years, with eucalyptus; soybean cropping for one year followed by pasture for three years; soybean cropping for one year followed by pasture for three years; continuous summer soybean cropping under conventional cultivation; continuous summer soybean cropping under conservation farming; and continuous no-till summer soybean cropping. Except for degraded pastures, pasture systems have higher root dry mass than soybean cropping systems. The integrated production systems increase the dry weight of the roots, and the carbon content of the soil and reduce aluminum saturation and soil acidity. The highest percentages of roots are found in the 0–0.10 m range. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00288233
Volume :
67
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178650852
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2023.2167841