Back to Search Start Over

Dose‐intensified stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful vertebral metastases: A randomized phase 3 trial.

Authors :
Guckenberger, Matthias
Billiet, Charlotte
Schnell, Daniel
Franzese, Ciro
Spałek, Mateusz
Rogers, Susanne
Stelmes, Jean‐Jacques
Aebersold, Daniel M.
Hemmatazad, Hossein
Zimmermann, Frank
Zimmer, Jörg
Zilli, Thomas
Bruni, Alessio
Baumert, Brigitta G.
Nägler, Franziska
Gut, Philipp
Förster, Robert
Madani, Indira
Source :
Cancer (0008543X). Aug2024, Vol. 130 Issue 15, p2713-2722. 10p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this randomised study was to determine whether dose‐intensified stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for painful vertebral metastases results in increased rates of pain improvement compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) (control) 6 months after treatment. Methods: This randomized, controlled phase 3 trial was conducted between November 2016 and January 2023, when it was stopped early. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older; had one or two painful, stable, or potentially unstable vertebral metastases; and had a life expectancy of 1 year or longer according to the investigator's estimates. Patients received 48.5 grays (Gy) in 10 fractions (with epidural involvement) or 40 Gy in five fractions (without epidural involvement) in the SBRT group and 30 Gy in 10 fractions or 20 Gy in five fractions in the cEBRT group, respectively. The primary end point was an improvement in the pain score at the treated site by at least 2 points (on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 points) at 6‐month follow‐up. Data were analyzed on an intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol basis. Results: Of 214 patients who were screened for eligibility, 63 were randomized 1:1 between SBRT (33 patients with 36 metastases) and cEBRT (30 patients with 31 metastases). The median age of all patients was 66 years, and 40 patients were men (63.5%). In the intention‐to‐treat analysis, the 6‐month proportion of patients who had metastases with pain reduction by 2 or more points was significantly higher in the SBRT group versus the control group (69.4% vs. 41.9%, respectively; two‐sided p =.02). Changes in opioid medication intake relative to baseline were nonsignificant between the groups. No differences were observed in vertebral compression fracture or adverse event rates between the groups. Conclusions: Dose‐intensified SBRT improved pain score more effectively than cEBRT at 6 months. In this randomized clinical trial that included 63 patients with 67 painful vertebral metastases, the proportion of those who had metastases with pain improvement at 6‐month follow‐up was 69% in the stereotactic body radiotherapy group versus 42% in the conventional external beam radiotherapy group: a significant difference. Changes in opioid medication intake relative to baseline between the groups were not significant, and dose‐intensified stereotactic body radiotherapy was not associated with increased risks of adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0008543X
Volume :
130
Issue :
15
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cancer (0008543X)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178531643
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35310