Back to Search Start Over

Utilising systematic reviews to assess potential overtreatment and claim for better evidence-based research: an analysis of anticancer drugs versus supportive care in advanced esophageal cancer.

Authors :
Santero, Marilina
Meade, Adriana-Gabriela
Selva, Anna
Savall-Esteve, Olga
Bracchiglione, Javier
Macías, Ismael
Leache, Leire
Cerdà, Paula
Bonfill Cosp, Xavier
Appropriateness of Systemic Oncological Treatments for Advanced Cancer (ASTAC-Study) Research Group
Acosta-Dighero, Roberto
Antequera, Alba
Auladell-Rispau, Ariadna
Cantero-Fortiz, Yahveth
Hernández, Edgar D
Irassar, Juan
Meinardi, Pamela
Merchán-Galvis, Angela
Meza, Nicolas
Quintana, María Jesús
Source :
Systematic Reviews. 7/18/2024, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p1-14. 14p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Highlighting the identified gaps in evidence-based research concerning advanced esophageal cancer (EC) treatment and care, this review evaluates the efficacy and safety of anticancer drugs compared to supportive care for advanced EC patients, aiming to assess the appropriateness of usual treatments and identify the gaps that need to be filled with primary research. Methods: We searched (May 2022) MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Epistemonikos, and trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and PROSPERO) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anticancer drugs (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or biological/targeted therapy) with supportive care in advanced EC. The results were summarised using GRADE summary of finding tables. Results: We included 15 RCTs. Most studies did not have a special focus on EC, did not detail the treatment lines in all patients, and did not evaluate all outcomes. Anticancer drugs may result in a slight increase in overall survival (OS) (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.71, 0.86; MD 0.83 months) and better progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.56 95% CI 0.49, 0.64, MD 0.68 months), but also may increase toxicity (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.13, 1.65), without a significant improvement in quality of life. The certainty of evidence was low or very low due to indirectness of results and lack of specific focus on EC in some studies. Conclusion: RCTs on advanced EC lack specificity, detailed treatment line information, and evaluation of all relevant outcomes. Moreover, when they find any benefit, this is negligible. Therefore, the certainty to justify anticancer drug treatments instead of supportive care in advanced EC is low or very low, and this information should be actively shared with affected patients. More and better RCTs should be conducted to assess whether any old or new proposed treatment for advanced EC patients provides a better balance of benefits and harms than the supportive care. Systematic review registration: The study protocol was registered in OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7CHX6) on 2022–03-29. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20464053
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Systematic Reviews
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178526860
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02594-1