Back to Search Start Over

Association of Adverse Clinical Outcomes With Peri-Infarct Ischemia Detected by Stress Cardiac Magnetic Imaging.

Authors :
Bernhard, Benedikt
Ge, Yin
Antiochos, Panagiotis
Heydari, Bobak
Islam, Sabeeh
Sanchez Santiuste, Natalia
Steel, Kevin E.
Bingham, Scott
Mikolich, J. Ronald
Arai, Andrew E.
Bandettini, W. Patricia
Patel, Amit R.
Shanbhag, Sujata M.
Farzaneh-Far, Afshin
Heitner, John F.
Shenoy, Chetan
Leung, Steve W.
Gonzalez, Jorge A.
Raman, Subha V.
Ferrari, Victor A.
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). Jul2024, Vol. 84 Issue 5, p417-429. 13p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Early invasive revascularization guided by moderate to severe ischemia did not improve outcomes over medical therapy alone, underlying the need to identify high-risk patients for a more effective invasive referral. CMR could determine the myocardial extent and matching locations of ischemia and infarction. This study sought to investigate if CMR peri-infarct ischemia is associated with adverse events incremental to known risk markers. Consecutive patients were included in an expanded cohort of the multicenter SPINS (Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States) study. Peri-infarct ischemia was defined by the presence of any ischemic segment neighboring an infarcted segment by late gadolinium enhancement imaging. Primary outcome events included acute myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death, whereas secondary events included any primary events, hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure hospitalization, and late coronary artery bypass surgery. Among 3,915 patients (age: 61.0 ± 12.9 years; 54.7% male), ischemia, infarct, and peri-infarct ischemia were present in 752 (19.2%), 1,123 (28.8%), and 382 (9.8%) patients, respectively. At 5.3 years (Q1-Q3: 3.9-7.2 years) of median follow-up, primary and secondary events occurred in 406 (10.4%) and 745 (19.0%) patients, respectively. Peri-infarct ischemia was the strongest multivariable predictor for primary and secondary events (HR adjusted : 1.72 [95% CI: 1.23-2.41] and 1.71 [95% CI: 1.32-2.20], respectively; both P < 0.001), adjusted for clinical risk factors, left ventricular function, ischemia extent, and infarct size. The presence of peri-infarct ischemia portended to a >6-fold increased annualized primary event rate compared to those with no infarct and ischemia (6.5% vs 0.9%). Peri-infarct ischemia is a novel and robust prognostic marker of adverse cardiovascular events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07351097
Volume :
84
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178464695
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.062