Back to Search Start Over

The Social Value Misconception in Clinical Research.

Authors :
Earl, Jake
Dawson, Liza
Rid, Annette
Source :
American Journal of Bioethics. Jul2024, p1-17. 17p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

AbstractClinical researchers should help respect the autonomy and promote the well-being of prospective study participants by helping them make voluntary, informed decisions about enrollment. However, participants often exhibit poor understanding of important information about clinical research. Bioethicists have given special attention to “misconceptions” about clinical research that can compromise participants’ decision-making, most notably the “therapeutic misconception.” These misconceptions typically involve false beliefs about a study’s purpose, or risks or potential benefits for participants. In this article, we describe a misconception involving false beliefs about a study’s potential benefits for non-participants, or its expected social value. This social value misconception can compromise altruistically motivated participants’ decision-making, potentially threatening their autonomy and well-being. We show how the social value misconception raises ethical concerns for inherently low-value research, hyped research, and even ordinary research, and advocate for empirical and normative work to help understand and counteract this misconception’s potential negative impacts on participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15265161
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
American Journal of Bioethics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178436902
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2371119