Back to Search Start Over

Commercially available activity monitors such as the fitbit charge and apple watch show poor validity in patients with gait aids after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors :
Kooner, Paul
Baskaran, Sandhya
Gibbs, Vanessa
Wein, Sam
Dimentberg, Ronald
Albers, Anthony
Source :
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Research. 7/15/2024, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p1-7. 7p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine the validity of consumer grade step counter devices during the early recovery period after knee replacement surgery. Methods: Twenty-three participants wore a Fitbit Charge or Apple Watch Series 4 smart watch and performed a walking test along a 50-metre hallway. There were 9 males and 14 females included in the study with an average age of 68.5 years and BMI of 32. Each patient wore both the Fitbit Charge and Apple Watch while completing the walking test and an observer counted the ground truth value using a thumb-push tally counter. This test was repeated pre-operatively with no gait aid, immediately post operatively with a walker, at 6 weeks follow up with a cane and at 6 months with no gait aid. Bland-Altman plots were performed for all walking tests to compare the agreement between measurement techniques. Results: Mean overall agreement of step count for pre-operative and at 6 months for subjects walking without gait aids was excellent for both the Apple Watch vs. actual and Fitbit vs. actual with bias values ranging from − 0.87 to 1.36 with limits of agreement (LOA) ranging between − 10.82 and 15.91. While using a walker both devices showed extremely little agreement with the actual step count with bias values between 22.5 and 24.37 with LOA between 11.7 and 33.3. At 6 weeks post-op while using a cane, both the Apple Watch and Fitbit devices had a range of bias values between − 2.8 and 5.73 with LOA between − 13.51 and 24.97. Conclusions: These devices show poor validity in the early post operative setting, especially with the use of gait aids, and therefore results should be interpreted with caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1749799X
Volume :
19
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178417486
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04892-9