Back to Search Start Over

Unexpected positive cultures in revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors :
Lara-Taranchenko, Yuri
Moreira, Tiago
Alfaraj, Abdullah A.
Sandiford, N. Amir
Guerra-Farfán, Ernesto
Gehrke, Thorsten
Citak, Mustafa
Source :
International Orthopaedics. Aug2024, Vol. 48 Issue 8, p2041-2046. 6p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Unexpected positive cultures are defined as a single positive culture in intraoperative samples taken during revision surgery after prosthetic joint infection was preoperatively ruled out. This study aims to determine the prevalence of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). As a secondary objective, this study aims to compare the re-intervention rate in this specific group, between UPC and non-UPC patients. The hypothesis is that the UPC prevalence in patients who undergo a revision TKA after UKA is not higher than in other TKA revision cases and this does not increase the risk of re-intervention. Methods: This is a retrospective study where all patients who underwent a UKA revision from January 2016 to February 2023 in a high-volume arthroplasty centre, were analyzed. Unexpected positive culture prevalence in this group of patients was obtained. Results: During the included period, 270 UKA revision surgeries were performed. Eight cases had at least two positive cultures and were therefore excluded. The final analysis included 262 patients. Of these, 8 (3.05%) patients presented UPCs and the isolated microorganisms were low-virulence organisms. None of the UPC patients received any treatment. No statistical differences were found between UPC and non-UPC groups in the analyzed variables. Conclusion: The prevalence of unexpected positive cultures in patients following revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is lower than in patients who undergo a revision of total knee arthroplasty. In UKA patients a UPC does not seem to increase the risk of a re-intervention, so it can be safely ignored if ICM criteria are not met. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03412695
Volume :
48
Issue :
8
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Orthopaedics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178417463
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06203-7