Back to Search Start Over

Engagement in the digital age: Understanding "what works" for participatory technologies in environmental decision-making.

Authors :
Hafferty, Caitlin
Reed, Mark S.
Brockett, Beth F.T.
Orford, Scott
Berry, Robert
Short, Chris
Davis, Joshua
Source :
Journal of Environmental Management. Aug2024, Vol. 365, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Effective engagement is crucial for enhancing environmental decision-making processes, fostering more sustainable and equitable outcomes. However, the success of engagement is highly variable and context-dependent. While theoretical frameworks have been developed to explain outcome variance in engagement in environmental decision-making, they have not yet been tested in digital contexts, leaving their applicability to digital engagement processes unclear. More broadly, there are unanswered questions about the effectiveness of digital tools in achieving the goals of engagement, which have become increasingly pertinent amidst growing concerns about the potential of digital technologies for exacerbating exclusions, ethical issues, and systematically undermining democratic progress. This paper addresses this evidence gap by presenting findings from interviews with practitioners in UK public, private, and third sector organisations. Our results provide empirical insights into the technical, ethical, and inclusivity debates surrounding digital tools and their effectiveness in promoting accessible engagement, high-quality social interaction, place-based decision-making, and more trustworthy and credible outcomes. Our findings indicate that while current engagement theories are applicable to digital environments, the key explanatory factors acquire new dimensions in digital compared to in-person contexts. Drawing on the findings, this study contributes novel insights to expand current theory for explaining "what works" in engagement in environmental decisions, enhancing its relevance and applicability in the digital age. The paper concludes with evidence-led recommendations for environmental practitioners to improve engagement processes in digital and remote settings. [Display omitted] • There is a lack of evidence on the benefits and drawbacks of digital tools for engagement. • The applicability of current theories for engagement to digital and remote settings is unclear. • Key factors known to shape outcomes in engagement take on new dimensions in digital, remote environments. • There are new considerations which make engagement theory more relevant and applicable in digital contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03014797
Volume :
365
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Environmental Management
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178335080
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121365