Back to Search Start Over

Robotic versus laparoscopic pelvic lateral lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
Chen, Yi-Chang
Tsai, Yuan-Yao
Ke, Tao-Wei
Shen, Ming-Yin
Fingerhut, Abe
Chen, William Tzu-Liang
Source :
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques. Jul2024, Vol. 38 Issue 7, p3520-3530. 11p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: There are few available studies that compare the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of robotic pelvic lateral lymph node dissection compared to laparoscopic pelvic lateral lymph node dissection (LPLND) in advanced rectal cancer. This meta-analysis aims to compare perioperative outcomes between robotic and LPLND. Methods: We performed a systemic literature review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Perioperative parameters were extracted and pooled for analysis. This meta-analysis provided an analysis of heterogeneity and prediction intervals. Results: Five studies were included: 567 patients divided between 266 robotic and 301 LPLND. Overall operation time was longer in the robotic group than laparoscopic group (difference in means = 67.11, 95% CI [30.80, 103.42], p < 0.001) but the difference in the pelvic lateral lymph dissection time was not statistically significant (difference in means = − 1.212, 95% CI [ − 11.594, 9.171], p = 0.819). There were fewer overall complications in the robotic than in the laparoscopic group (OR = 1.589, 95% CI [1.009, 2.503], p = 0.046), especially with respect to urinary retention (OR = 2.23, 95% CI [1.277, 3.894], p = 0.005). More pelvic lateral lymph nodes were harvested by robotic surgery than by laparoscopy (differences in means = − 1.992, 95% CI [ − 2.421, 1.563], p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, robotic pelvic lateral lymph node dissection was associated with more pelvic lateral lymph nodes harvested and lower overall complications, especially urinary retention when compared to LPLND. Further studies are needed to reinforce these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18666817
Volume :
38
Issue :
7
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178230396
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10901-z