The role of bone remodeling in measuring migration of custom implants for large acetabular defects.

In revision total hip arthroplasty, achieving robust fixation is difficult and implant movement may occur over time. Bone may also rearrange around the implant as a result of mechanical loading, making the measurement of migration challenging. The study aimed to quantify changes in bone shape and implant position 1 year following acetabular reconstruction using custom three‐dimensional‐printed cups. This observational retrospective cohort study involved 23 patients with Paprosky type IIIB defects. Postop computed tomography scans taken within 1 week of surgery and at 1‐year postsurgery were co‐registered and analyzed. Three co‐registration strategies were implemented including bone‐to‐bone and implant‐to‐implant. (1) Co‐registration of the ipsilateral innominate bone (diseased anatomy) was used to measure changes in implant position. (2) Co‐registration of the implant was carried out to quantify changes in the ipsilateral innominate bone shape. (3) Co‐registration of the contralateral innominate bone (nondiseased anatomy) was performed to measure changes in the ipsilateral innominate bone shape and implant position. The median centroid distances (interquartile range [IQR]) were 2.3 mm (IQR: 3.7–1.7 mm) for changes in implant position, 2.4 mm (IQR: 3.6–1.6 mm) for changes in ipsilateral innominate bone shape, and 3.7 mm (IQR: 4.6–3.5 mm) for changes in ipsilateral innominate bone shape and implant position. Following acetabular reconstruction, implant movements and periprosthetic bone remodeling are physiological and of a similar extent. Surgeons and engineers should consider this when performing implant monitoring in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]