3D Printed P(VdF‐HFP)/SBA‐15 composite‐based gel polymer electrolyte versus commercial celgard: A comparative investigation on thermal stability and electrochemical performance for lithium‐ion battery application.

MLA

Robert, Vijay, et al. “3D Printed P(VdF‐HFP)/SBA‐15 Composite‐based Gel Polymer Electrolyte versus Commercial Celgard: A Comparative Investigation on Thermal Stability and Electrochemical Performance for Lithium‐ion Battery Application.” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 107, no. 9, Sept. 2024, pp. 5903–22. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.19863.

APA

Robert, V., Loganathan, S., Sivashanmugam, A., Thomas, S., & Valapa, R. B. (2024). 3D Printed P(VdF‐HFP)/SBA‐15 composite‐based gel polymer electrolyte versus commercial celgard: A comparative investigation on thermal stability and electrochemical performance for lithium‐ion battery application. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 107(9), 5903–5922. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.19863

Chicago

Robert, Vijay, Sravanthi Loganathan, Arumugam Sivashanmugam, Sabu Thomas, and Ravi Babu Valapa. 2024. “3D Printed P(VdF‐HFP)/SBA‐15 Composite‐based Gel Polymer Electrolyte versus Commercial Celgard: A Comparative Investigation on Thermal Stability and Electrochemical Performance for Lithium‐ion Battery Application.” Journal of the American Ceramic Society 107 (9): 5903–22. doi:10.1111/jace.19863.