Back to Search Start Over

A systematic review of failed endoscopic hemostasis for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors :
Toro Tole, David
Maurel, Amelie
Hedger, Joe
Kwan, Sherman
Weber, Dieter
Source :
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Mar2024, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p309-315. 7p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a surgical emergency, usually managed via endoscopy. Approximately 2% of patients will have another significant bleed after therapeutic endoscopy and may require either transarterial embolization (TAE) or surgery. In 2011, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommended that TAE should be the preferred option offered in this setting. This study aimed to conduct an appraisal of guidelines on NVUGIB using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. A specific review of their recommendations on the management of adult patients with failed endoscopic hemostasis that required TAE or surgery was conducted. The quality of the guidelines was moderate; most could be recommended with changes. However, their recommendations regarding TAE vs surgery were widely heterogeneous. A closer review of the underpinning evidence showed that most studies were retrospective, with a small sample size and missing data. Because of the heterogeneity in evidence, the decision regarding TAE vs surgery requires further research. Deciding between these modalities is primarily based on TAE availability and patient comorbidities. However, surgery should not be dismissed as a key option after failed endoscopic hemostasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1091255X
Volume :
28
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178069879
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2023.12.020