Back to Search Start Over

Impact of the Reverse 2-Step Algorithm for Clostridioides difficile Testing in the Microbiology Laboratory on Hospitalized Patients.

Authors :
Hilt, Evann E
Vaughn, Byron P
Galdys, Alison L
Evans, Michael D
Ferrieri, Patricia
Source :
Open Forum Infectious Diseases. May2024, Vol. 11 Issue 5, p1-7. 7p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background Multistep laboratory testing is recommended for the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). The aim of this study was to present the impact of multistep CDI diagnostic testing in an academic hospital system and evaluate the toxin B gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) values of PCR-positive tests. Methods In October 2022, our system began reflex testing all PCR-positive stool samples with the C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (Techlab), an enzyme immunoassay–based test with results for the glutamate dehydrogenase antigen (GDH) and C difficile toxin A/B. Hospital-onset (HO) CDI and CDI antibiotic use before and after testing were tracked. Ct values were obtained from the Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Laboratory. Receiver operating curve analysis was used to examine the sensitivity and specificity for identifying GDH+/toxin+ and GDH−/toxin− at various Ct thresholds. Results The HO-CDI rate decreased from 0.352 cases per 1000 patient-days to 0.115 cases per 1000 patient-days post–reflex testing (P <.005). Anti-CDI antibiotics use decreased, but the decrease was not commensurate with CDI rates following reflex testing. PCR+/GDH+/toxin+ samples had a lower mean Ct value than PCR+/GDH–/toxin– samples (23.3 vs 33.5, P <.0001). A Ct value of 28.65 could distinguish between those 2 groups. Fifty-four percent of PCR+/GDH+/toxin− samples had a Ct value below that cut-off, suggesting the possibility of CDI with a negative toxin test. Conclusions Reflex testing for a laboratory diagnosis of CDI results in rapid, systemwide decreases in the rate of HO-CDI. Additional research is needed to distinguish CDI from C difficile colonization in patients with discordant testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23288957
Volume :
11
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177948110
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae244