Back to Search Start Over

Lumbar functional evaluation of pelvic bone sarcomas after surgical resection and spinal pelvic fixation: A clinical study of 304 cases.

Authors :
Shi, Qianyu
Guo, Wei
Ji, Tao
Tang, Xiaodong
Source :
Cancer Medicine. Jun2024, Vol. 13 Issue 11, p1-10. 10p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Aims: We endeavored to introduce a novel scoring system (Lumbar Functional Index, LFI) capable of evaluating lumbar function in pelvic bone sarcoma patients who underwent surgical resection and spinal pelvic fixation, while simultaneously identifying the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors of lumbar function impairment among these populations. Patients and Methods: A cohort of 304 primary bone sarcoma patients were recruited. The LFI was created based on the Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. Lumbar function impairment was defined as LFI score ≥ 18 points, which was identified as high LFI. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Results: The cohort included chondrosarcoma (39.8%), osteosarcoma (29.9%), Ewing sarcoma (8.6%), bone‐derived undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (7.2%), giant cell tumor of bone (7.2%), chordoma (2.3%), and other bone sarcomas (5.0%). The LFI score exhibited significant negative correlation with common scoring systems of bone sarcoma. The incidence of high LFI was 23.0%. Patients with high LFI demonstrated a higher prevalence of type I + II + III + IV pelvic tumor, more sacrificed nerve roots and bilateral lumbar spine fixation during surgery, while lower percentage of R0 resection and local control of pelvic tumor. Decreased median overall survival (30 vs. 52 months, p < 0.001) and recurrence‐free survival (14 vs. 24 months, p < 0.001) time were observed in these patients. Type I + II + III + IV pelvic tumor and sacrificed nerve roots≥2 were identified as risk factors for high LFI, while R0 resection and local control were identified as protective factors. Conclusion: The LFI scoring system exhibited a significant negative correlation to current scoring systems. High LFI patients had worse prognosis and distinct characteristics. The risk factors of high LFI included type I + II + III + IV pelvic tumor and sacrificed nerve roots≥2, and the protective factors included R0 resection and local control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20457634
Volume :
13
Issue :
11
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cancer Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177929478
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7282