On the cyclic behavior of wave-driven sandspits with implications for coastal zone management.

Sandspits at river mouths are important socio-ecological but fragile coastal ecosystems. Due to their significant role, particularly in shielding areas behind them from wave impact, sandspits are crucial, albeit they also pose challenges such as increased fluvial flooding, which often necessitates substantial engineering interventions such as artificial breaching. Here, four wave-dominated sandspits are compared to determine their common behavior. The study sites at river mouths have in common a high control of waves on longshore sediment transport leading to sandspit development; the Langue de Barbarie at the Senegal River delta, the Bouche du Roi at the mouth of the Mono River in Benin, the Mataquito River mouth in Chile, and the Pomene River mouth in Mozambique, each characterized by unique hydrodynamic conditions and geomorphologic features that influence their evolution and susceptibility to natural and anthropogenic impacts. Their cycles of opening and development, typically spanning decades, are studied by collecting 37 years of shoreline and wave reanalysis data from the Landsat and Sentinel-2 missions. It is shown that part of the morphodynamics is truly intrinsic and that climatic wave evolution drives only a small part of their evolution. A simplified model is introduced to predict the cyclic behavior of spits. The proposed model for sandspit development is based on a cyclic behavior, where newly formed spits mature and eventually break, resetting the cycle. This cyclic perception is represented as a function of time, where the elongation of the spit relative to its maximum length is modeled as a function of time and a constant wave-driven longshore sediment transport component. The model is tested at several sites with similar environmental conditions and blindly at one site with reasonable results. The present work also highlights the importance of spit evolution and the associated variability they impose on coastal downdrift and updrift, especially when considering anticipating the implementation of engineering solutions. • Cyclic behavior of sand spit lengthening. • Predicting sand spit length with a conceptual model. • Updrift and downdrift coastal impact of a sand spit lengthening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]