Back to Search Start Over

Developing a prognostic model for stress reduction in patients with prolonged work‐related stress.

Authors :
Jensen, Johan Høy
Rugulies, Reiner
Flachs, Esben Meulengracht
Petersen, Kajsa Ugelvig
Ross, Lone
Eller, Nanna Hurwitz
Khoury, Bassam
Source :
Stress & Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress. Jun2024, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p1-8. 8p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Mindfulness‐based stress reduction (MBSR) is a 9‐session group‐treatment programme for managing stress. Research suggests variability in the outcomes of MBSR among participants. This prognostic (not causal) study develops a multivariable model that may support clinicians in forecasting expected MBSR outcomes. We used data of 763 patients collected from MBSR programs conducted between October 2015 and March 2022. Candidate prognostic factors at baseline included psychosocial work environment, sociodemographic, and clinical information. Multiple imputation was used to handle missing data (imputations = 200). Important prognostic factors were backward selected in ≥5% of the imputed datasets. The final prediction model including the selected prognostic factors was evaluated using linear regression with a four‐fold internal cross‐validation procedure. Reductions in perceived stress from baseline to end of the MBSR programme were predicted by a lower General Severity Index (β = 2.00, p < 0.01), higher baseline levels of stress (β = −0.88, p < 0.01), and somewhat by having managerial responsibility in the latest job (vs. no; β = −2.53, p = 0.07). The remaining prognostic factors were weaker predictors, for example, gender and income. Internal validity of the final model was indicated by consistent results from four randomly folded subsamples. This study developed a prognostic model predicting changes in stress levels in relation to the MBSR programme. A reduction in stress level was particularly predicted by milder psychological symptoms and higher baseline levels of perceived stress. These predictions cannot be taken as evidence of causal associations. Forecasting of the illness course should be cautiously practiced using clinical judgement regarding individual patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15323005
Volume :
40
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Stress & Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177798118
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3329