Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on hemodynamics during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects of remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Methods: This was a single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial set at Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan. We included 36 patients aged ≥ 20 years scheduled to undergo elective transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) under general anesthesia. The participants were randomly assigned to the remimazolam and propofol groups (n = 18 each). Remimazolam- or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia was initiated at 12 mg/kg/min or 2.5 mcg/mL via target-controlled infusion, respectively, along with remifentanil. After confirming the loss of consciousness, the administration rate was adjusted using electroencephalographic monitoring. The primary outcome was the rate of arterial hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg, from anesthesia induction until the beginning of the surgical incision. The total doses of ephedrine and phenylephrine were also assessed. Results: During anesthesia induction, the arterial hypotension rates were 11.9% and 21.6% in the remimazolam and propofol groups, respectively (P = 0.01). The total dose of ephedrine was higher in the propofol group (14.4 mg) than in the remimazolam group (1.6 mg) (P < 0.001); however, the total dose of phenylephrine was not significantly different between the two groups (propofol 0.31 mg vs. remimazolam: 0.17 mg, P = 0.10). Conclusion: Remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia resulted in a lower hypotension rate than propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia during induction in patients undergoing TAVR. Remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia can be used safely during anesthetic induction in patients with severe aortic stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]