Back to Search Start Over

Measurement properties of movement smoothness metrics for upper limb reaching movements in people with moderate to severe subacute stroke.

Authors :
Cornec, Gwenaël
Lempereur, Mathieu
Mensah-Gourmel, Johanne
Robertson, Johanna
Miramand, Ludovic
Medee, Beatrice
Bellaiche, Soline
Gross, Raphael
Gracies, Jean-Michel
Remy-Neris, Olivier
Bayle, Nicolas
Source :
Journal of NeuroEngineering & Rehabilitation (JNER). 5/29/2024, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p1-11. 11p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Movement smoothness is a potential kinematic biomarker of upper extremity (UE) movement quality and recovery after stroke; however, the measurement properties of available smoothness metrics have been poorly assessed in this group. We aimed to measure the reliability, responsiveness and construct validity of several smoothness metrics. Methods: This ancillary study of the REM-AVC trial included 31 participants with hemiparesis in the subacute phase of stroke (median time since stroke: 38 days). Assessments performed at inclusion (Day 0, D0) and at the end of a rehabilitation program (Day 30, D30) included the UE Fugl Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and 3D motion analysis of the UE during three reach-to-point movements at a self-selected speed to a target located in front at shoulder height and at 90% of arm length. Four smoothness metrics were computed: a frequency domain smoothness metric, spectral arc length metric (SPARC); and three temporal domain smoothness metrics (TDSM): log dimensionless jerk (LDLJ); number of submovements (nSUB); and normalized average rectified jerk (NARJ). Results: At D30, large clinical and kinematic improvements were observed. Only SPARC and LDLJ had an excellent reliability (intra-class correlation > 0.9) and a low measurement error (coefficient of variation < 10%). SPARC was responsive to changes in movement straightness (rSpearman=0.64) and to a lesser extent to changes in movement duration (rSpearman=0.51) while TDSM were very responsive to changes in movement duration (rSpearman>0.8) and not to changes in movement straightness (non-significant correlations). Most construct validity hypotheses tested were verified except for TDSM with low correlations with clinical metrics at D0 (rSpearman<0.5), ensuing low predictive validity with clinical metrics at D30 (non-significant correlations). Conclusions: Responsiveness and construct validity of TDSM were hindered by movement duration and/or noise-sensitivity. Based on the present results and concordant literature, we recommend using SPARC rather than TDSM in reaching movements of uncontrolled duration in individuals with spastic paresis after stroke. Trial Registration: NCT01383512, https://clinicaltrials.gov/, June 27, 2011. Highlights: Reliability, responsiveness and construct validity of SPARC were satisfactory. Responsiveness and construct validity of LDLJ, NARJ and nSUB were highly related to movement duration. LDLJ had an excellent reliability and a low measurement error, but not NARJ and nSUB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17430003
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of NeuroEngineering & Rehabilitation (JNER)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177559821
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01382-1