Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy and safety of post-closure technique using Perclose ProGlide/ProStyle device for large-bore mechanical circulatory support access sites.
- Source :
-
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine . May2024, Vol. 62, p60-65. 6p. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) using a venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) device or a catheter-type heart pump (Impella) is critical for the rescue of patients with severe cardiogenic shock. However, these MCS devices require large-bore cannula access (14-Fr and larger) at the femoral artery or vein, which often requires surgical decannulation. In this retrospective study, we evaluated post-closure method using a percutaneous suture-mediated vascular closure system, Perclose ProGlide/ProStyle (Abbott Vascular, Lake Bluff, IL, Perclose), as an alternative procedure for MCS decannulation. Closure of 83 Impella access sites and 68 VA-ECMO access sites performed using Perclose or surgical method between January 2018 and March 2023 were evaluated. MCS decannulation using Perclose was successfully completed in all access sites without surgical hemostasis. The procedure time of ProGlide was shorter than surgical decannulation for both Impella and VA-ECMO (13 min vs. 50 min; p < 0.001, 21 min vs. 65 min; p < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in the 30-day survival rate and major adverse events by decannulation including arterial dissection requiring endovascular treatment, hemorrhage requiring a large amount of red blood cell transfusion, and access site infection. Our results suggest that the post-closure technique using the percutaneous suture-mediated closure system appears to be a safe and effective method for large-bore MCS decannulation. • Perclose shortens the access site closure time compared to surgical cutdown for MCS devices. • The median procedure time for Impella removal using Perclose was 13 min. • The median procedure time for VA-ECMO removal using Perclose was 21 min. • No significant difference in survival rate and adverse events between Perclose and surgical removal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 15538389
- Volume :
- 62
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 177201206
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2023.12.016