Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of ultrasound- versus fluoroscopy-guidEd femorAl access In tranS-catheter aortic valve replacement In the Era of contempoRary devices: The EASIER registry.

Authors :
Bianchini, Emiliano
Morello, Alberto
Bellamoli, Michele
Romagnoli, Enrico
Aurigemma, Cristina
Tagliaferri, Marco
Montonati, Carolina
Dumonteil, Nicolas
Cimmino, Michele
Villa, Emmanuel
Corcione, Nicola
Bettari, Luca
Messina, Antonio
Stanzione, Alessio
Troise, Giovanni
Mor, Donata
Maggi, Antonio
Bellosta, Raffaello
Pegorer, Matteo Alberto
Zoccai, Giuseppe Biondi
Source :
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. May2024, Vol. 62, p40-47. 8p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Vascular complications (VCs) still represent one of the principal concerns of trans-femoral trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR). New-generation devices can minimize such complications but the arterial access management is left to the operator's choice. This study aims to describe the rate of VCs in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing TAVR with new-generation devices and to determine whether an ultrasound-guided (USG) vs. a fluoroscopy-guided (FG) femoral access management has an impact on their prevention. This is a prospective, observational, multicenter study. Consecutive patients undergoing TAVR with new-generation devices were analyzed from January 2022 to October 2022 in five tertiary care centers. Femoral accesses were managed according to the operator's preferences. All the patients underwent a pre-discharge peripheral ultrasound control. VCs and bleedings were the main endpoints of interest. A total of 458 consecutive patients were enrolled (274 in the USG group and 184 in the FG group). VCs occurred in 6.5 % of the patients (5.2 % minor and 1.3 % major). There was no difference between the USG and the FG groups in terms of any VCs (7.3 % vs. 5.4 %; p = 0.4), or any VARC-3 bleedings (6.9 % vs 6 %, p = 0.9). At logistic regression analysis, the two guidance strategies did not result as predictors of VCs (odds Ratio 0.8, 95 % Confidence Interval 0.46–1.4; P = 0.4). In a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing TAVR with new-generation devices, the occurrence of VCs is low and mostly represented by minor VCs. USG and FG modalities did not affect the rate of VCs. Central Illustration – Ultrasound-guided vs. Fluoroscopy-guided puncture in contemporary TF-TAVR procedures. Abbreviations : FG: fluoroscopy-guided; TF-TAVR: trans-femoral trans-catheter aortic valve replacement; USG: ultrasound-guided. [Display omitted] • TAVR with new-generation devices are associated with a low incidence of VCs • Most of the occurred VCs are minor • The modality to obtain the main access (USG vs FG) seems not to affect the rate of VCs [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15538389
Volume :
62
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177201198
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2023.12.007