Toward More Accurate Modeling of Canopy Radiative Transfer and Leaf Electron Transport in Land Surface Modeling.

Modeling leaf photosynthesis is essential for quantifying the carbon, water, and energy fluxes of the terrestrial biosphere. However, due to the lack of simultaneous measurements of leaf light absorption and gas exchange, canopy radiative transfer (RT) and photosynthesis modeling often rely on simplified assumptions about light absorption and electron transport. These assumptions ignore variations in leaf biophysical traits and environmental conditions. In this study, we utilized a next‐generation land surface model (LSM)—CliMA Land, which incorporates hyperspectral canopy RT and provides a more accurate representation of trait variations. We evaluated the potential bias in electron transport estimates introduced by the broadband RT schemes used in traditional LSMs. Additionally, we explored the impact of different leaf electron transport parameterization schemes on global‐scale photosynthesis and fluorescence modeling. We showed that (a) traditional LSMs that disregard the impacts of leaf temperature and leaf traits on electron transport tend to overestimate electron transport rates. (b) Photosynthesis and fluorescence within a grid can exhibit biases exceeding 20%, with these biases demonstrating contrasting seasonality. (c) Global estimates of integrated photosynthesis and fluorescence differ by 8.1% and 8.8%, respectively. These results underscore the importance of adopting more sophisticated and accurate modeling schemes, such as hyperspectral canopy RT, in future LSMs and Earth system modeling to enhance the reliability of modeling outcomes. Plain Language Summary: The way sunlight interacts within the forest canopy is often simulated using just two broad channels: one for light that helps plants grow (photosynthetically active radiation) and one for near‐infrared light. Unfortunately, these simulations don't take into account key things about leaves, like their color (determined by chlorophyll). These simplifications mean that the models ignore differences in how different leaves respond to light. For instance, green light is more common in the lower canopy, but the models treat it the same as red and blue light. The problem is that plants can use red and blue light more effectively for photosynthesis. So, while these simplified models are faster, they can lead to big mistakes when estimating how much light leaves can absorb and how much they can photosynthesize. To address this issue, we used a more detailed model that considers many different wavelengths of light. We looked at how much the simplified models might mess up estimates of photosynthesis and fluorescence. Our findings show that these errors can be larger than 20% for specific locations. To help make the simplified models more accurate, we've provided data and formulas that consider differences in leaf traits and light conditions throughout the canopy. Key Points: Hyperspectral canopy radiative transfer model is used to assess the biases in electron transport, photosynthesis, and fluorescenceVegetation gross primary productivity and solar‐induced fluorescence may be substantially biased in broadband radiative transfer modelsApproaches are provided for broadband radiative transfer models [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]