Effect of Human Activity and Presence on the Behavior of Long-Tailed Macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in an Urban Tourism Site in Kuala Selangor, Malaysia.

Simple Summary: Monkeys in urban spaces are often labeled as 'pests' by people who share spaces with them, mainly driven by their behavior to adapt and survive in a human-dominated environment. In Malaysia, there has been an increase in complaints about urban monkeys, which drives management strategies mainly to reduce human populations that impact the animals' welfare and conservation. Understanding the dynamics between monkeys, people, and the urban ecosystem is the first step to identifying the drivers of the complaints. This study investigates the types of ecological activities of the long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis) at an urban tourism site and how human activity influences it. Monkeys were impacted negatively by the presence of humans. Less affiliative interactions were performed when human traffic was high; for example, less social behavior was seen in the group. The monkeys also used anthropogenic structures predominantly when people were present and would spend time on natural structures when people were not. This study supports evidence that monkeys alter behaviors to adapt to living in urban spaces. A structured management plan needs to consider these dynamics to manage complaints. The increasing overlap of resources between human and long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis) (LTM) populations have escalated human–primate conflict. In Malaysia, LTMs are labeled as a 'pest' species due to the macaques' opportunistic nature. This study investigates the activity budget of LTMs in an urban tourism site and how human activities influence it. Observational data were collected from LTMs daily for a period of four months. The observed behaviors were compared across differing levels of human interaction, between different times of day, and between high, medium, and low human traffic zones. LTMs exhibited varying ecological behavior patterns when observed across zones of differing human traffic, e.g., higher inactivity when human presence is high. More concerning is the impact on these animals' welfare and group dynamics as the increase in interactions with humans takes place; we noted increased inactivity and reduced intra-group interaction. This study highlights the connection that LTMs make between human activity and sources of anthropogenic food. Only through understanding LTM interaction can the cause for human–primate conflict be better understood, and thus, more sustainable mitigation strategies can be generated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]