Combined multiplex panel test results are a poor estimate of disease prevalence without adjustment for test error.

MLA

Challen, Robert, et al. “Combined Multiplex Panel Test Results Are a Poor Estimate of Disease Prevalence without Adjustment for Test Error.” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 20, no. 4, Apr. 2024, pp. 1–14. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012062.

APA

Challen, R., Chatzilena, A., Qian, G., Oben, G., Kwiatkowska, R., Hyams, C., Finn, A., Tsaneva-Atanasova, K., & Danon, L. (2024). Combined multiplex panel test results are a poor estimate of disease prevalence without adjustment for test error. PLoS Computational Biology, 20(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012062

Chicago

Challen, Robert, Anastasia Chatzilena, George Qian, Glenda Oben, Rachel Kwiatkowska, Catherine Hyams, Adam Finn, Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova, and Leon Danon. 2024. “Combined Multiplex Panel Test Results Are a Poor Estimate of Disease Prevalence without Adjustment for Test Error.” PLoS Computational Biology 20 (4): 1–14. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012062.