Back to Search Start Over

Shared decision making in elderly patients with kidney failure.

Authors :
Kanbay, Mehmet
Basile, Carlo
Battaglia, Yuri
Mantovani, Alessandro
Yavuz, Furkan
Pizzarelli, Francesco
Luyckx, Valerie A
Covic, Adrian
Liakopoulos, Vassilios
Mitra, Sandip
Source :
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. May2024, Vol. 39 Issue 5, p742-751. 10p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

'Elderly' is most commonly defined as an individual aged 65 years or older. However, this definition fails to account for the differences in genetics, lifestyle and overall health that contribute to significant heterogeneity among the elderly beyond chronological age. As the world population continues to age, the prevalence of chronic diseases, including chronic kidney disease (CKD), is increasing and CKD frequently progresses to kidney failure. Moreover, frailty represents a multidimensional clinical entity highly prevalent in this population, which needs to be adequately assessed to inform and support medical decisions. Selecting the optimal treatment pathway for the elderly and frail kidney failure population, be it haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or conservative kidney management, is complex because of the presence of comorbidities associated with low survival rates and impaired quality of life. Management of these patients should involve a multidisciplinary approach including doctors from various specialties, nurses, psychologists, dieticians and physiotherapists. Studies are mostly retrospective and observational, lacking adjustment for confounders or addressing selection and indication biases, making it difficult to use these data to guide treatment decisions. Throughout this review we discuss the difficulty of making a one-size-fits-all recommendation for the clinical needs of older patients with kidney failure. We advocate that a research agenda for optimization of the critical issues we present in this review be implemented. We recommend prospective studies that address these issues, and systematic reviews incorporating the complementary evidence of both observational and interventional studies. Furthermore, we strongly support a shared decision-making process matching evidence with patient preferences to ensure that individualized choices are made regarding dialysis vs conservative kidney management, dialysis modality and optimal vascular access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09310509
Volume :
39
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176847371
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfad211