Back to Search Start Over

On the feasibility and the impact resistance of a 3D cross-based fractal produced by powder bed fusion additive manufacturing.

Authors :
Viccica, Marco
Serra, Gabriel Ferreira
de Sousa, Ricardo Alves
Galati, Manuela
Source :
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. May2024, Vol. 132 Issue 5/6, p2217-2232. 16p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Designers have been fascinated by exploring new geometries made by high-performance structures. In more specific terms, biological systems have always been proven to be characterised by sophisticated structures with adapting properties to nature challenges. Insightful analyses have shown how these natural structures are dominated by characteristics such as high energy absorption and elevated strength-weight proportion. Fractal geometries are examples of bio-inspired mathematical objects whose complex 3D structures can be obtained only by advanced manufacturing systems, such as additive manufacturing (AM). This study investigates the feasibility and energy absorption properties of a novel fractal structure based on a 3D Greek cross (3D-CFS). The structure was designed with different volume fractions and produced by powder bed fusion (PBF) AM processes in polyamide (PA12) and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). The 3D-CFS properties are investigated under quasi-static and dynamic compression tests. The analysis revealed that for certain geometrical parameters, the manufacturing of the structures is constrained by the sintered powder entrapped in the structure. However, in the case of powder-free structures, the results showed a high impact resistance and cushioning capability. Overall, in terms of specific energy absorption (SEA), the TPU structures showed values between 2.5 and 3.5 kJ/kg, while PA12 ones are between 7.5 and 17.4 kJ/kg, making the 3D-CFS structure compatible with personal protective equipment (PPE) applications. Compared to the literature data on cellular structures made by AM, 3D-CFS performs considerably better. Also, PA12 3D-CFS is better, with a SEA value up to 170% higher than that of a typical material employed for head PPE (e.g. EPS-60 SEA equal to 2.76 kJ/kg). In contrast, TPU 3D-CFS looks more promising in the case of multiple impact conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02683768
Volume :
132
Issue :
5/6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176843057
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13503-0