Eco-toxicological and climate change effects of sludge thermal treatments: Pathways towards zero pollution and negative emissions.

The high moisture content and the potential presence of hazardous organic compounds (HOCs) and metals (HMs) in sewage sludge (SS) pose technical and regulatory challenges for its circular economy valorisation. Thermal treatments are expected to reduce the volume of SS while producing energy and eliminating HOCs. In this study, we integrate quantitative analysis of SS concentration of 12 HMs and 61 HOCs, including organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) and per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), with life-cycle assessment to estimate removal efficiency of pollutants, climate change mitigation benefits and toxicological effects of existing and alternative SS treatments (involving pyrolysis, incineration, and/or anaerobic digestion). Conventional SS treatment leaves between 24 % and 40 % of OPFRs unabated, while almost no degradation occurs for PFAS. Thermal treatments can degrade more than 93% of target OPFRs and 95 % of target PFAS (with the rest released to effluents). The different treatments affect how HMs are emitted across environmental compartments. Conventional treatments also show higher climate change impacts than thermal treatments. Overall, thermal treatments can effectively reduce the HOCs emitted to the environment while delivering negative emissions (from about −56 to −111 kg CO 2 -eq per tonne of sludge, when pyrolysis is involved) and producing renewable energy from heat integration and valorization. [Display omitted] • A wide range of novel characterization factors for PFAS and OPFRs are estimated. • Pyrolysis and incineration degrade from 94 % to 99 % of PFAS, OPFRs and BPA. • HMs are the dominant pollutants affecting human health and freshwater ecotoxicity. • Direct pyrolysis is the best option to deliver negative emissions and abate HOCs. • Conventional treatments leave about 40 % of OPFRs unabated, and no PFAS degradation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]