Back to Search Start Over

Improving the D etection, A ssessment, M anagement and P revention of D elirium in Hospices (the DAMPen-D study): Feasibility study of a flexible and scalable implementation strategy to deliver guideline-adherent delirium care.

Authors :
Jackson, Gillian P
Jackson, Catriona E
Boland, Jason W
Featherstone, Imogen
Huang, Chao
Ogden, Margaret
Sartain, Kathryn
Siddiqi, Najma
Twiddy, Maureen
Pearson, Mark
Johnson, Miriam J
Source :
Palliative Medicine. Apr2024, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p447-456. 10p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Delirium is a complex condition, stressful for all involved. Although highly prevalent in palliative care settings, it remains underdiagnosed and associated with poor outcomes. Guideline-adherent delirium care may improve its detection, assessment and management. Aim: To inform a future definitive study that tests whether an implementation strategy designed to improve guideline-adherent delirium care in palliative care settings improves patient outcomes (reduced proportion of in-patient days with delirium). Design: With Patient Involvement members, we conducted a feasibility study to assess the acceptability of and engagement with the implementation strategy by hospice staff (intervention), and whether clinical record data collection of process (e.g. guideline-adherent delirium care) and clinical outcomes (evidence of delirium using a validated chart-based instrument;) pre- and 12-weeks post-implementation of the intervention would be possible. Setting/participants: In-patient admissions in three English hospices. Results: Between June 2021 and December 2022, clinical record data were extracted from 300 consecutive admissions. Despite data collection during COVID-19, target clinical record data collection (n = 300) was achieved. Approximately two-thirds of patients had a delirium episode during in-patient stay at both timepoints. A 6% absolute reduction in proportion of delirium days in those with a delirium episode was observed. Post-implementation improvements in guideline-adherent metrics include: clinical delirium diagnosis 15%–28%; delirium risk assessment 0%–16%; screening on admission 7%–35%. Conclusions: Collection of data on delirium outcomes and guideline-adherence from clinical records is feasible. The signal of patient benefit supports formal evaluation in a large-scale study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02692163
Volume :
38
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Palliative Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176694276
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241236325