Methodological considerations for more robust and reliable developmental science: How historical conventions bias behavioral measurements.

This article is the author’s response to a commentary on their original article, “Methodological integrity assessment in the mobile paradigm literature: A lesson for understanding opportunistic use of researcher degrees of freedom in psychology”. Here Sen and Gredebäck respond to each aspect of the commentary on the topics of null findings, the dependency between learning criteria and memory, the utilization of simulations in mobile paradigm research, and memory development in early infancy.