Back to Search Start Over

Impact of coronary hyperemia on collateral flow correction of coronary microvascular resistance indices.

Authors :
Boerhout, Coen K. M.
Veelen, Anna van
Feenstra, Rutger G. T.
Jong, Elize A. M. de
Namba, Hanae F.
Beijk, Marcel A. M.
Henriques, Jose P.
Piek, Jan J.
Hoef, Tim P. van de
Source :
American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology. Apr2024, Vol. 326 Issue 4, pH1037-H1044. 8p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Recently, a novel method to estimate wedge pressure (Pw)-corrected minimal microvascular resistance (MR) was introduced. However, this method has not been validated since, and there are some theoretical concerns regarding the impact of different physiological conditions on the derivation of Pw measurements. This study sought to validate the recently introduced method to estimate Pw-corrected MR in a Doppler-derived study population and to evaluate the impact of different physiological conditions on the Pw measurements and the derivation of Pw-corrected MR. The method to derive "estimated" hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) without the need for Pw measurements was validated by estimating the coronary fractional flow reserve (FFRcor) from myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFRmyo) in a Doppler-derived study population (N = 53). From these patients, 24 had hyperemic Pw measurements available for the evaluation of hyperemic conditions on the derivation of Pw and its effect on the derivation of both "true" (with measured Pw) and "estimated" Pw-corrected HMR. Nonhyperemic Pw differed significantly from Pw measured in hyperemic conditions (26 ± 14 vs. 35 ± 14 mmHg, respectively, P < 0.005). Nevertheless, there was a strong linear relationship between FFRcor and FFRmyo in nonhyperemic conditions (R2 = 0.91, P < 0.005), as well as in hyperemic conditions (R2 = 0.87, P < 0.005). There was a strong linear relationship between "true" HMR and "estimated" HMR using either nonhyperemic (R2 = 0.86, P < 0.005) or hyperemic conditions (R2 = 0.85, P < 0.005) for correction. In contrast to a modest agreement between nonhyperemic Pw-corrected HMR and apparent HMR (R2 = 0.67, P < 0.005), hyperemic Pw-corrected HMR showed a strong agreement with apparent HMR (R2 = 0.88, P < 0.005). We validated the calculation method for Pw-corrected MR in a Doppler velocity-derived population. In addition, we found a significant impact of hyperemic conditions on the measurement of Pw and the derivation of Pw-corrected HMR. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: The following are what is known: 1) wedge-pressure correction is often considered for the derivation of indices of minimal microvascular resistance, and 2) the Yong method for calculating wedge pressure-corrected index of microvascular resistance (IMR) without balloon inflation has never been validated in a Doppler-derived population and has not been tested under different physiological conditions. This study 1) adds validation for the Yong method for calculated wedge-pressure correction in a Doppler-derived study population and 2) shows significant influence of the physiological conditions on the derivation of coronary wedge pressure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Subjects

Subjects :
*BLOOD flow measurement
*HYPEREMIA

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03636135
Volume :
326
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176589859
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00771.2023