Back to Search Start Over

The efficacy of dyadic interventions for community-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
Balvert, Sanne C.E.
Del Sordo, Giovanna C.
Milders, Maarten V.
Source :
Ageing Research Reviews. Apr2024, Vol. 96, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Most people with dementia live at home and depend on informal caregivers for care. Both caregivers and persons with dementia can experience negative psychological and behavioural effects as the disease progresses. Non-pharmacological interventions can alleviate these effects and dyadic interventions, involving both caregiver and person with dementia, may be particularly effective. In this systematic review, the effect of dyadic interventions involving community-dwelling persons with dementia and their informal caregivers was researched. This article is an update of a review of dyadic interventions up to 2012 (Van't Leven et al., 2013). Twenty-two randomized controlled trials published between January 2012 and March 2023 met eligibility criteria, representing 3857 dyads. Results of a meta-analysis showed no overall intervention effect. Thirteen studies reported positive intervention effects, 9 studies reported no intervention effects. Intervention content and participant characteristics and knowledge of the disease varied widely between the studies reviewed. Effective interventions were those that matched activities for the person with dementia to their interests and abilities and educating the caregiver about dementia and communication. Interventions of moderate length (3–4 months) tended to be more effective than longer or shorter interventions. Future studies should further explore the factors contributing to the effects of dyadic interventions. • Effective interventions adapt activities to preferences of the person with dementia. • Interventions most frequently improved quality of life and neuropsychiatric symptoms. • Interventions with a duration of 3–4 months were most effective. • Symptom severities and specific needs influence the efficacy of dyadic interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15681637
Volume :
96
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Ageing Research Reviews
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176542432
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2024.102258