Back to Search Start Over

Randomized Trial of Concomitant Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Boost Versus Conventionally Fractionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Boost for Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer (pHART2-RCT).

Authors :
Glicksman, Rachel M.
Loblaw, Andrew
Morton, Gerard
Vesprini, Danny
Szumacher, Ewa
Chung, Hans T.
Chu, William
Liu, Stanley K.
Tseng, Chia-Lin
Correa, Rohann
Deabreu, Andrea
Mamedov, Alexandre
Zhang, Liying
Cheung, Patrick
Source :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. May2024, Vol. 119 Issue 1, p100-109. 10p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The aim of this work is to report on the results of a phase 2 randomized trial of moderately hypofractionated (MH) versus conventionally fractionated (CF) radiation therapy to the prostate with elective nodal irradiation. This was a single-center, prospective, phase 2 randomized study. Patients with high-risk disease (cT3, prostate-specific antigen level >20 ng/mL, or Gleason score 8-10) were eligible. Patients were randomized to either MH using a simultaneous integrated boost (68 Gy in 25 fractions to prostate; 48 Gy to pelvis) or CF (46 Gy in 23 fractions with a sequential boost to the prostate of 32 Gy in 16 fractions), with long-term androgen deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint was grade ≥2 acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0). Secondary endpoints included late GI and GU toxicity, quality of life, and oncologic outcomes. One-hundred eighty patients were enrolled; 90 were randomized to and received MH and 90 to CF. The median follow-up was 67.4 months. Seventy-five patients (41.7%) experienced a grade ≥2 acute GI and/or GU toxicity, including 34 (37.8%) in the MH and 41 (45.6%) in the CF arms, respectively (P =.29). Late grade ≥2 GI (P =.07) and GU (P =.25) toxicity was not significantly different between arms; however, late grade ≥3 GI toxicity was worse in the MH group (P =.01). There were no statistically significant quality-of-life differences between the 2 treatments. There were no statistically significant differences observed in cumulative incidence of biochemical failure (P =.71) or distant metastasis (P =.31) and overall survival (P =.46). MH to the prostate and pelvis with androgen deprivation therapy for men with high-risk localized prostate cancer was not significantly different than CF with regard to acute toxicity, quality of life, and oncologic efficacy. However, late grade ≥3 GI toxicity was more common in the MH arm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03603016
Volume :
119
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176537653
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.006