Back to Search
Start Over
The rehabilitation robot: factors influencing its use, advantages and limitations in clinical rehabilitation.
- Source :
-
Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology . Apr2024, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p546-557. 12p. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Despite the proven effectiveness of rehabilitation robots (RR) in the literature, they are still little used in clinical rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to analyse the factors influencing the use of RR and the perception of therapists who used RR. In order to characterize the factors influencing the use of RR by therapists, a semi-structured interview was conducted with 18 therapists. These interviews are based on an interview guide inspired by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model. The interviews were recorded and then transcribed, summarized and finally synthesized cross-sectionally. In addition and in parallel, the System Usability Scale (SUS) was also proposed to clinicians in order to collect quantitative data. The interviews highlight the facilitators perceived by the therapists, such as the intensity of the movement, the complementarity with conventional rehabilitation. The results also showed the possible barriers perceived, these can be sometimes inconclusive (e.g., bugs). The SUS results show no effect, either on the gender of the users, their therapists, or the duration of use of the tool. Better communication on the functionality of the robot and the construction of achievable goals would lead to more results that are conclusive but also better patient care. To date, and despite the evidence for the effectiveness of RRs, therapists believe that there are still many barriers to their use. They agree, however, that if changes are made, RRs will become an integral part of therapy. The study idenfied and highlighted the factors influencing the use of the rehabilitation robot in the clinics through metric and ergonomic evaluations. The study allowed to quantify the level of acceptance of the Lokomat among therapists. This study allowed to identify negative factors that could be resolved through the implementation of a structured and generalized protocol for patients and thus improve their care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *PHYSICAL therapy
*PSYCHOLOGY of physicians
*CROSS-sectional method
*PEARSON correlation (Statistics)
*PHYSICAL therapists' attitudes
*ERGONOMICS
*QUALITATIVE research
*SENSORIMOTOR integration
*INTERVIEWING
*CONTENT analysis
*QUESTIONNAIRES
*KRUSKAL-Wallis Test
*GAIT disorders
*COLLEGE teachers
*PHYSICIANS' attitudes
*QUANTITATIVE research
*MANN Whitney U Test
*CHI-squared test
*NEUROLOGICAL disorders
*ROBOTIC exoskeletons
*ASSISTIVE technology
*THEMATIC analysis
*PHYSICAL education for people with disabilities
*COLLEGE teacher attitudes
*ROBOTICS
*RESEARCH methodology
*ONE-way analysis of variance
*BODY movement
*QUALITY assurance
*DATA analysis software
*PSYCHOSOCIAL factors
*PHYSICAL therapists
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 17483107
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 176495436
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2107095