Back to Search Start Over

Imaging follow-up strategy after endovascular treatment of Intracranial aneurysms: A literature review and guideline recommendations.

Authors :
Yong-Hwan Cho
Jaehyung Choi
Chae-Wook Huh
Chang Hyeun Kim
Chul Hoon Chang
Soon Chan KWON
Young Woo Kim
Seung Hun Sheen
Sukh Que Park
Jun Kyeung Ko
Sung-kon Ha
Hae Woong Jeong
Hyen Seung Kang
Source :
Journal of Cerebrovascular & Endovascular Neurosurgery. Mar2024, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p1-10. 10p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: Endovascular coil embolization is the primary treatment modality for intracranial aneurysms. However, its long-term durability remains of concern, with a considerable proportion of cases requiring aneurysm reopening and retreatment. Therefore, establishing optimal follow-up imaging protocols is necessary to ensure a durable occlusion. This study aimed to develop guidelines for follow-up imaging strategies after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Methods: A committee comprising members of the Korean Neuroendovascular Society and other relevant societies was formed. A literature review and analyses of the major published guidelines were conducted to gather evidence. A panel of 40 experts convened to achieve a consensus on the recommendations using the modified Delphi method. Results: The panel members reached the following consensus: 1. Schedule the initial follow-up imaging within 3-6 months of treatment. 2. Noninvasive imaging modalities, such as three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or contrast-enhanced MRA, are alternatives to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) during the first follow-up. 3. Schedule mid-term follow-up imaging at 1, 2, 4, and 6 years after the initial treatment. 4. If noninvasive imaging reveals unstable changes in the treated aneurysms, DSA should be considered. 5. Consider late-term follow-up imaging every 3-5 years for lifelong monitoring of patients with unstable changes or at high risk of recurrence. Conclusions: The guidelines aim to provide physicians with the information to make informed decisions and provide patients with high-quality care. However, owing to a lack of specific recommendations and scientific data, these guidelines are based on expert consensus and should be considered in conjunction with individual patient characteristics and circumstances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22348565
Volume :
26
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Cerebrovascular & Endovascular Neurosurgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176494991
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.08.008