Back to Search Start Over

Skeletal Muscle Energetics Explain the Sex Disparity in Mobility Impairment in the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging.

Authors :
Kramer, Philip A
Coen, Paul M
Cawthon, Peggy M
Distefano, Giovanna
Cummings, Steven R
Goodpaster, Bret H
Hepple, Russell T
Kritchevsky, Stephen B
Shankland, Eric G
Marcinek, David J
Toledo, Frederico G S
Duchowny, Kate A
Ramos, Sofhia V
Harrison, Stephanie
Newman, Anne B
Molina, Anthony J A
Source :
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences. Apr2024, Vol. 79 Issue 4, p1-11. 11p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The age-related decline in muscle mitochondrial energetics contributes to the loss of mobility in older adults. Women experience a higher prevalence of mobility impairment compared to men, but it is unknown whether sex-specific differences in muscle energetics underlie this disparity. In the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA), muscle energetics were characterized using in vivo phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy and high-resolution respirometry of vastus lateralis biopsies in 773 participants (56.4% women, age 70–94 years). A Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score ≤8 was used to define lower-extremity mobility impairment. Muscle mitochondrial energetics were lower in women compared to men (eg, Maximal Complex I&II OXPHOS: Women = 55.06 ± 15.95; Men = 65.80 ± 19.74; p  < .001) and in individuals with mobility impairment compared to those without (eg, Maximal Complex I&II OXPHOS in women: SPPB ≥ 9 = 56.59 ± 16.22; SPPB ≤ 8 = 47.37 ± 11.85; p  < .001). Muscle energetics were negatively associated with age only in men (eg, Maximal ETS capacity: R  = −0.15, p  = .02; age/sex interaction, p  = .04), resulting in muscle energetics measures that were significantly lower in women than men in the 70–79 age group but not the 80+ age group. Similarly, the odds of mobility impairment were greater in women than men only in the 70–79 age group (70–79 age group, odds ratio [OR]age-adjusted = 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03, 3.08, p  = .038; 80+ age group, ORage-adjusted = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.52, 2.15, p  = .89). Accounting for muscle energetics attenuated up to 75% of the greater odds of mobility impairment in women. Women had lower muscle mitochondrial energetics compared to men, which largely explain their greater odds of lower-extremity mobility impairment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10795006
Volume :
79
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176469924
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glad283