Back to Search Start Over

Stability in care and risk of loss to follow‐up among clients receiving community health worker‐led differentiated HIV care: Results from a prospective cohort study in northern Tanzania.

Authors :
Abdul, Ramadhani
Rinke de Wit, Tobias F.
Martelli, Giulia
Costigan, Kathleen
Katambi, Patrobas
Pozniak, Anton
Maokola, Werner
Mfinanga, Sayoki
Hermans, Sabine
Source :
Tropical Medicine & International Health. Apr2024, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p309-318. 10p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: HIV services in Tanzania are facility‐based but facilities are often overcrowded. Differentiated care models (DCM) have been introduced into the National Guidelines. We piloted a Community Health Worker (CHW)‐led HIV treatment club model (CHW‐DCM) in an urban region, and assessed its effectiveness in comparison to the standard of care (SoC, facility‐based model), in terms of stability in care, loss to follow‐up (LTFU) and treatment adherence. Methods: In two clinics in the Shinyanga region, clients established on ART (defined as stable clients by national guidelines as on first‐line ART >6 months, undetectable viral load, no opportunistic infections or pregnancy, and good adherence) were offered CHW‐DCM. This prospective cohort study included all stable clients who enrolled in CHW‐DCM between July 2018 and March 2020 (CHW‐DCM) and compared them to stable clients who remained in SoC during that period. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyse factors associated with continued stability in care and the risk of LTFU during 18 months of follow‐up; treatment adherence was assessed by pill count and compared using Chi‐square tests. Results: Of 2472 stable clients, 24.5% received CHW‐DCM and 75.5% SoC. CHW‐DCM clients were slightly older (mean 42.8 vs. 37.9 years) and more likely to be female (36.2% vs. 32.2%). Treatment adherence was better among CHW‐DCM than SoC: 96.6% versus 91.9% and 98.5% versus 92.2%, respectively (both p = 0.001). SoC clients were more likely to not remain stable over time than CHW‐DCM (adjusted Hazard ratio [AHR] = 2.68; 95% CI: 1.86–3.90). There was no difference in LTFU (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 1.54; 95%CI: 0.82–2.93). Conclusion: Clients attending CHW‐DCM demonstrated better stability in care and treatment adherence than SoC, and the risk of LTFU was not increased. These findings demonstrate the potential of CHW in delivering community‐based HIV services in the local Tanzanian context. These results could be used to extend this CHW‐DCM model to similar settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13602276
Volume :
29
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176353430
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13975