Back to Search
Start Over
Plastic pigtail vs lumen-apposing metal stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis (PROMETHEUS study): an open-label, multicenter randomized trial.
- Source :
-
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques . Apr2024, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p2148-2159. 12p. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have displaced double-pigtail plastic stents (DPS) as the standard treatment for walled-off necrosis (WON),β but evidence for exclusively using LAMS is limited. We aimed to assess whether the theoretical benefit of LAMS was superior to DPS. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, randomized trial was carried out in 9 tertiary hospitals. Between June 2017, and Oct 2020, we screened 99 patients with symptomatic WON, of whom 64 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the DPS group (n = 31) or the LAMS group (n = 33). The primary outcome was short-term (4-weeks) clinical success determined by the reduction of collection. Secondary endpoints included long-term clinical success, hospitalization, procedure duration, recurrence, safety, and costs. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03100578. Results: A similar clinical success rate in the short term (RR, 1.41; 95% CI 0.88–2.25; p = 0.218) and in the long term (RR, 1.2; 95% CI 0.92–1.58; p = 0.291) was observed between both groups. Procedure duration was significantly shorter in the LAMS group (35 vs. 45-min, p = 0.003). The hospital admission after the index procedure (median difference, − 10 [95% CI − 17.5, − 1]; p = 0.077) and global hospitalization (median difference − 4 [95% CI − 33, 25.51]; p = 0.82) were similar between both groups. Reported stent-related adverse events were similar for the two groups (36 vs.45% in LAMS vs. DPS), except for de novo fever, which was significantly 26% lower in LAMS (RR, 0.26 [0.08–0.83], p = 0.015). Conclusions: The clinical superiority of LAMS over DPS for WON therapy was not proved, with similar clinical success, hospital stay and similar safety profile between both groups, yet a significant reduction in procedure time was observed. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03100578. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *PATIENT safety
*RESEARCH funding
*STATISTICAL sampling
*HOSPITAL care
*COST analysis
*SURGICAL stents
*ENDOSCOPIC ultrasonography
*NECROTIZING pancreatitis
*TREATMENT effectiveness
*RANDOMIZED controlled trials
*TREATMENT duration
*MEDICAL drainage
*PLASTICS
*RESEARCH
*METALS
*LENGTH of stay in hospitals
*DISEASE relapse
*CONFIDENCE intervals
*COMPARATIVE studies
*SENSITIVITY & specificity (Statistics)
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 18666817
- Volume :
- 38
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 176339460
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10699-w