Back to Search Start Over

3D seismic mask auto encoder: Seismic inversion using transformer-based reconstruction representation learning.

Authors :
Dou, Yimin
Li, Kewen
Source :
Computers & Geotechnics. May2024, Vol. 169, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Estimating acoustic impedance from seismic data is a crucial step in reservoir characterization. While data-driven impedance inversion based on deep learning has shown promising results, it relies heavily on extensive well logs for labeling, which is often impractical in many exploration scenarios. Recently, the zero-shot or few-shot learning performance of Pretrained Foundation Models like Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) and Mask Auto Encoder (MAE) has highlighted that knowledge learned from vast amounts of unlabeled data can be transferred to downstream tasks with minimal labeled data. However, applying Transformer-based representation learning models to 3D seismic data inversion poses three challenges: (1) Computational and memory constraints due to the high-dimensional nature of the data; (2) Difficulty in extracting fine-grained image features using Transformers, hampering high-frequency impedance inversion; (3) Fixed input size in Transformers, leading to inversion artifacts. In this work, we introduce the Seismic Mask Auto Encoder (SeisMAE), a Transformer-based representation model tailored for the inversion of 3D seismic data. It incorporates three key components: (1) Aggregated dimensionality reduction encoding to handle redundancy in seismic data, significantly improving computational efficiency; (2) Multi-scale self-attention feature fusion to enhance the model's capacity for low-level feature representation; and (3) A stitching decoding strategy to eliminate inversion stitching artifacts. Experimental validations highlight the efficacy of our approach. On the synthetic SEAM I dataset, we demonstrate the effectiveness of each component and SeisMAE's superior performance. For real-world data on The Netherlands F3, SeisMAE delivers reliable inversion outcomes with only four labeled examples. We compared SeisMAE against various inversion techniques, including 1D Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN), UNet-based, HRNet-based, and TransInver, where SeisMAE exhibited significant advantages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0266352X
Volume :
169
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Computers & Geotechnics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176296521
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106194